Comparison

LYNCE vs Filestage, honestly.

One routes the review, one performs the check. Compared on what each actually does, including where they complement each other.

LYNCEAutomated creative QA · findings enginevsFilestageOnline proofing & approval workflow

What each product is built for.

Filestage is online proofing software: creative work is shared into review steps, stakeholders annotate directly on files, versions stay organised, and approvals land on due dates. It handles images, PDFs, video, documents and live websites, with a deep integrations list and enterprise compliance certifications. Its AI “Review Agents” add automated flags for typos, broken links, technical issues, brand-guideline violations and regulatory risks.

LYNCE doesn’t route reviews at all. It’s the check itself: images and multi-page PDFs read in full against briefs, price lists, approved copy, other versions and the master language, returning findings with severity, evidence and a suggested fix. The report shares as a link; your team stays the decision-maker. See what creative QA covers.

Two centers of gravity.

→ Sent to Anna for review💬 “Price looks off?” · comment on v3✓ Approved by Chris · due FridayThe workflow moves; a human still decides if €45 is right

Proofing platforms route the review

Filestage’s core: files to reviewers, comments in context, versions, due dates and approvals. Review Agents flag typos, broken links, brand-guideline and regulatory issues along the way.

Must fixPrice vs brief

€45€40

Fix The signed brief approves €40. Source quoted.

InconsistencyFeed vs story version

Doors 20:00 / 21:00

Fix Two versions disagree; align both.

LYNCE performs the check

Before anyone reviews anything, the campaign is read against the brief, the price list, the other versions and the master language. The findings arrive as evidence, not opinions.

The facts, side by side.

WhatLYNCEFilestage
CategoryAutomated creative QA: the software finds the issuesOnline proofing: review and approval workflow for teams
Core jobReads creatives against briefs, references, versions and translations; returns evidence-based findingsRoutes files to reviewers; collects comments, versions and approvals with due dates
Automated checksDeep content QA: reference comparison with the source quoted, cross-creative consistency, translation checks, typos. Every finding carries a severity and a suggested fixReview Agents scan for typos, broken links and technical issues, brand guideline violations, and regulatory flags
Human reviewNot a workflow tool; your team reviews the findings reportCore strength: approval workflows, reviewer roles, due dates, audit trail
Input filesImages (JPG, PNG, WEBP) and multi-page PDFsPDFs, images, videos, animations, documents, HTML/live websites, packaging files
IntegrationsShare via report links; no third-party integrations listedAsana, Trello, Jira, ClickUp, Slack, Teams, Adobe apps, Zapier and more
Compliance postureISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, AES-256 listed
SharingReport links that open without a loginReviewer links into the proofing workspace
Free tier20 free credits (one-time)Free plan for small teams
Paid plansCapacity-based (1 image = 1 credit, 1 analysed PDF page = 1 credit). See pricingFrom $99/mo

Filestage details are taken from Filestage’s public website (filestage.io) as of August 2026 and may change; verify current features and pricing with Filestage before deciding. “Not listed” means we couldn’t find the capability documented there, not that it’s impossible.

Who should pick which.

Plenty of teams run both: LYNCE first, so the factual errors are gone; then the approval workflow for sign-off. If you’re choosing one, choose by your bottleneck.

Choose LYNCE if…

  • Reviewers keep missing factual errors inside the creatives: wrong prices, dates, claims.
  • You want checks against briefs, price lists and approved copy, with the source quoted.
  • Campaign versions and translations must be verified against each other, not just eyeballed.
  • You want an automated findings report and a shareable no-login link, without adopting a workflow tool.

Filestage fits better if…

  • Your bottleneck is the review process itself: routing, deadlines, approvals, audit trails.
  • You proof video, documents and live websites, not just static creatives.
  • You need the integrations (Asana, Slack, Adobe…) and enterprise compliance posture.

LYNCE vs Filestage, answered.

The final check, before it goes live.

Give the finished creative one more QA pass before publish, send or print.

Keep comparing